Clough v Breen (No. 6)
Case
•
[2024] NSWSC 1634
•18 December 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Clough v Breen (No. 6) [2024] NSWSC 1634
[2024] NSWSC 1634
18 December 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The proceedings in Clough v Breen involved a protracted dispute between two property owners over easements. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, which was asked to determine whether the interlocutory regime of orders imposed on the parties should be continued on a permanent basis and, if so, whether those orders should be varied. The case has been the subject of multiple proceedings over many years, leading to the court being asked to consider the appropriateness of the interlocutory orders in light of the final judgment.
The court was required to decide whether the interlocutory regime of orders should be maintained and whether any variations were necessary. Additionally, the court had to consider the appropriateness of a specified gross sum costs order under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98(4)(c) in light of the long-running dispute and the need to accelerate the disengagement of the parties from their present disputes. The discretionary factors relevant to making a specified gross sum costs order included the need to avoid further aggravating contests between the parties, particularly in relation to costs assessment.
The court held that the interlocutory regime of orders should be continued on a permanent basis but with some variations to reflect the final judgment. The court also found that a specified gross sum costs order should be made instead of a costs assessment. The court considered it necessary to accelerate the disengagement of the parties from their present disputes and to avoid further aggravating contests between them, including in relation to costs assessment. The discretionary factors relevant to making a specified gross sum costs order, including the long-running nature of the dispute, led the court to conclude that this was the appropriate course of action.
The court made an order that the interlocutory regime of orders be continued on a permanent basis with certain variations, and a specified gross sum costs order was made in favour of the plaintiff.
The court was required to decide whether the interlocutory regime of orders should be maintained and whether any variations were necessary. Additionally, the court had to consider the appropriateness of a specified gross sum costs order under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98(4)(c) in light of the long-running dispute and the need to accelerate the disengagement of the parties from their present disputes. The discretionary factors relevant to making a specified gross sum costs order included the need to avoid further aggravating contests between the parties, particularly in relation to costs assessment.
The court held that the interlocutory regime of orders should be continued on a permanent basis but with some variations to reflect the final judgment. The court also found that a specified gross sum costs order should be made instead of a costs assessment. The court considered it necessary to accelerate the disengagement of the parties from their present disputes and to avoid further aggravating contests between them, including in relation to costs assessment. The discretionary factors relevant to making a specified gross sum costs order, including the long-running nature of the dispute, led the court to conclude that this was the appropriate course of action.
The court made an order that the interlocutory regime of orders be continued on a permanent basis with certain variations, and a specified gross sum costs order was made in favour of the plaintiff.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Easements & Covenants
-
Interlocutory Orders
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Clough v Breen (No. 6) [2024] NSWSC 1634
Most Recent Citation
Clough v Breen (No.7) [2025] NSWSC 344
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Breen v Clough
[2025] NSWCA 144
Breen v Clough
[2024] NSWCA 316
Clough v Breen (No.7)
[2025] NSWSC 344
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
1
Re Aquaqueen International Pty Ltd
[2015] NSWSC 500
Australasian Performing Rights Association Ltd v Marlin
[1999] FCA 1006
Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc
[2000] FCA 628