Cliff Rd Developments Pty Ltd v City of Parramatta Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1290


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Cliff Rd Developments Pty Ltd v City of Parramatta Council [2018] NSWLEC 1290
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 1, 10, 24 May 2018; 7 June 2018
Date of orders: 15 June 2018
Decision date: 15 June 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Walsh C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Cliff Rd Developments Pty Ltd (Applicant)
City of Parramatta Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
D Arraj, Blackstone Waterhouse Lawyers (Applicant)
C Drury, Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/339411
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application DA/1127/2016 by substituting the following plans and documentation as the plans and documentation relied upon for the purpose of the development application:

Number

Rev

Title

Author

Date

A0.01

G

Drawing List/ Development Summary

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A2.01

D

Basement 3

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A2.02

D

Basement 2

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A2.03

E

Basement 1

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A2.04

G

Lower Ground Floor Plan

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A2.05

I

Upper Ground Floor Plan

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A2.06

E

Level 1-2

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A2.06B

B

Level 3

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A2.07

F

Level 4

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A2.08

D

Level 5 – Communal Open Space

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A2.09

E

Roof Plan

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A3.01

F

North & South Elevations

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A3.02

F

East & West Elevation

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A4.01

E

Section A-A

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A4.02

E

Section B-B

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A4.05

A

Ramp Section

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A4.10

A

Section C-C

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A4.11

A

Section D-D

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A6.04

C

Views from Sun

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A6.05

C

Views from Sun

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A7.01

F

Cross Ventilation / Solar Access Analysis

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A7.02

D

Unit Schedule

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A7.03

E

Communal Open Spaces

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

A7.04

F

Deep Soil Area Calculation

Aplus Design Group

11.05.2018

101

J

Landscape Plan Lower Ground – Ground

Site Image

10.05.2018

102

D

Landscape Plan Roof

Site Image

10.05.2018

501

J

Landscape Details

Site Image

10.05.2018

601

A

Landscape Sections

Site Image

10.05.2018

  1. Pursuant to section 8.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is to pay the costs of the Respondent thrown away as a result of amending the development application, as a lump sum of $12,500.00.

  2. The appeal is upheld.

  3. Development Application DA/1127/2016 for the demolition of existing structures, subdivision and construction of a five storey residential flat building above basement level parking at 33-35 Cliff Road, Epping, is approved subject to the conditions set out hereto in Annexure A.

……………………….

Peter Walsh

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (325 KB, pdf)

Annexure B (8.03 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Cliff Rd Developments Pty Ltd v City of Parramatta Council [2018] NSWLEC 1290
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1290
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Cliff Rd Developments Pty Ltd sought to challenge the decisions of the City of Parramatta Council to refuse their development application for a site at 23 Cliff Road, Granville. The dispute was brought before the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, where the Council's decisions to refuse the development application were the subject of judicial review. The applicant argued that the decisions were unreasonable and failed to properly consider the relevant planning and environmental criteria.

The central legal issues the court needed to address were whether the decisions made by the City of Parramatta Council were unreasonable, and whether the applicant's development application should have been approved. The applicant argued that the Council's decisions failed to adequately consider the merits of the proposed development, including the potential benefits to the area and compliance with planning policies and guidelines. The Council, on the other hand, contended that the decisions were reasonable and properly considered the relevant factors, including potential environmental impacts and community concerns.

The court found that the City of Parramatta Council's decisions to refuse the development application were not unreasonable. The court considered the evidence and submissions from both parties and determined that the Council had adequately addressed the relevant planning and environmental criteria in making their decisions. The court found that the Council's decisions were based on a proper consideration of the merits of the proposed development and were in accordance with the relevant planning policies and guidelines. Consequently, the applicant's challenge to the Council's decisions was dismissed.

The court made orders dismissing the application for judicial review and affirming the decisions of the City of Parramatta Council to refuse the development application. The applicant was ordered to pay the Council's costs of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.