Cleaves & Cleaves
Case
•
[2021] FamCA 571
•5 August 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Cleaves & Cleaves [2021] FamCA 571
[2021] FamCA 571
5 August 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Cleaves & Cleaves*, Ms Cleaves (the applicant wife) sought interim departure orders from the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for periodic child support and for non-periodic orders requiring Mr Cleaves (the respondent husband) to pay private school fees and health insurance. An existing administrative assessment of child support was due for renewal in August 2021.
The primary legal issues before Harper J were whether the wife satisfied the criteria under section 116(1)(b) of the relevant legislation to enliven the court's discretion to make a departure order, whether it was in the interests of both parents for the court to consider such an order, and whether the circumstances of the case were special and established grounds under section 117(2).
Harper J dismissed the wife's application. The court found that the wife had not satisfied the threshold requirements to justify a departure from the administrative assessment. The circumstances presented were not considered special, and the grounds relied upon did not meet the statutory criteria for making a departure order. Consequently, the court declined to exercise its discretion to make the requested orders regarding child support, private school fees, and health insurance. The costs of the application were reserved.
The primary legal issues before Harper J were whether the wife satisfied the criteria under section 116(1)(b) of the relevant legislation to enliven the court's discretion to make a departure order, whether it was in the interests of both parents for the court to consider such an order, and whether the circumstances of the case were special and established grounds under section 117(2).
Harper J dismissed the wife's application. The court found that the wife had not satisfied the threshold requirements to justify a departure from the administrative assessment. The circumstances presented were not considered special, and the grounds relied upon did not meet the statutory criteria for making a departure order. Consequently, the court declined to exercise its discretion to make the requested orders regarding child support, private school fees, and health insurance. The costs of the application were reserved.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Cleaves & Cleaves [2021] FamCA 571
Most Recent Citation
Caffyn & Caffyn [2021] FedCFamC1F 68
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Sappho & Sappho (No 2)
[2022] FedCFamC1F 786
Caffyn & Caffyn
[2021] FedCFamC1F 68
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
5
Yewen & Child Support Registrar & Anor
[2014] FCCA 2399
Warwick & Cutler
[2016] FamCA 934
Yewen & Child Support Registrar & Anor
[2014] FCCA 2399