| [2018] FWCA 3208 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd
(AG2018/457)
CLEANAWAY (MUNICIPAL) HARDWARE SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Waste management industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 4 JUNE 2018 |
Application for approval of the Cleanaway (Municipal) Hardwaste Services Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cleanaway (Municipal) Hardwaste Services Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 June 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE428654 PR607749>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 3208
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3208
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009. The union representatives argued that certain terms of the agreement were unfair and did not adequately protect the employees' rights and entitlements. They also raised concerns about the process by which the agreement was negotiated and the extent to which employee representatives were involved in the negotiation process.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement did not comply with certain provisions of the Fair Work Act and the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act. The Commission was particularly concerned with the lack of proper consultation and negotiation processes between the parties and the failure to provide adequate information to the employee representatives. The Commission also found that certain terms of the agreement were unfair and did not adequately protect the employees' rights and entitlements. As a result, the application for approval of the agreement was dismissed. The Commission ordered that the agreement be returned to the parties for further negotiation and consultation in accordance with the relevant legislative provisions.
The Fair Work Commission's decision highlights the importance of proper consultation and negotiation processes in the development of enterprise agreements. The Commission emphasised that the parties must work together in good faith to negotiate an agreement that is fair and reasonable for both employers and employees. The decision also underscores the need for adequate protection of employees' rights and entitlements in enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.