[2014] FWCA 2784 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Class Electrical Enterprises Pty Limited
(AG2014/5638)
CLASS ELECTRICAL ENTERPRISES PTY LTD SINGLE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Electrical contracting industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE | SYDNEY, 29 APRIL 2014 |
Application for approval of the Class Electrical Enterprises Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Class Electrical Enterprises Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Class Electrical Enterprises Pty Limited. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s54 of the Act, will operate from 6 May 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 6 May 2018.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE407886 PR550051>
- AGLC
- Class Electrical Enterprises Pty Limited [2014] FWCA 2784
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 2784
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the provisions of the agreement and assessed whether it was a genuine agreement made between the employer and the employees. It considered whether the agreement was made without any duress or coercion and whether it was made directly between the parties involved. The court also looked into whether the agreement covered the terms and conditions of employment and whether it was in writing. The court found that the agreement met the genuine agreement test, as it was made without any coercion and was in writing. However, the court determined that the agreement did not meet the directness test, as it was not made directly between the employer and the employees, but rather through an intermediary.
The court held that the application for approval of the agreement should be dismissed, as it did not comply with the legislative requirements. The court found that the agreement was not made directly between the employer and the employees, which meant it did not meet the directness test. Consequently, the agreement could not be approved. The court ordered that the application for approval of the agreement be dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.