CJU v HealthShare NSW
Case
•
[2021] NSWCATAD 372
•15 December 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
CJU v HealthShare NSW [2021] NSWCATAD 372
[2021] NSWCATAD 372
15 December 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of CJU v HealthShare NSW involved an application for review of a decision by HealthShare NSW, a statutory corporation, regarding the handling of personal information. The applicant, CJU, sought review of the respondent's handling of their personal information, specifically concerning its disclosure to another agency. The case was heard and determined in the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales.
The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were whether the respondent breached sections 10 and 18 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 by failing to notify the applicant of certain matters and by disclosing the applicant's personal information to another agency without a valid exception or exemption. The applicant argued that the respondent's actions constituted a breach of their privacy rights under the Act.
In its decision, the Tribunal found that the respondent did not comply with section 10 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act by failing to notify the applicant of specific matters relating to the collection of their personal information. The Tribunal also found that the disclosure of the applicant's personal information to another agency was a breach of section 18 of the Act, as neither the exception in section 18(1)(a) nor the exemption in section 27A applied. The Tribunal concluded that the respondent's actions were unlawful and constituted a breach of the applicant's privacy rights.
The Tribunal ordered that the respondent file and serve submissions as to remedy by a specified date, with the applicant then having the opportunity to respond. The matter was to be relisted for directions as to remedies before a Senior Member of the Tribunal. The orders made by the Tribunal addressed the breaches found and set out a process for determining appropriate remedies for the applicant.
The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were whether the respondent breached sections 10 and 18 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 by failing to notify the applicant of certain matters and by disclosing the applicant's personal information to another agency without a valid exception or exemption. The applicant argued that the respondent's actions constituted a breach of their privacy rights under the Act.
In its decision, the Tribunal found that the respondent did not comply with section 10 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act by failing to notify the applicant of specific matters relating to the collection of their personal information. The Tribunal also found that the disclosure of the applicant's personal information to another agency was a breach of section 18 of the Act, as neither the exception in section 18(1)(a) nor the exemption in section 27A applied. The Tribunal concluded that the respondent's actions were unlawful and constituted a breach of the applicant's privacy rights.
The Tribunal ordered that the respondent file and serve submissions as to remedy by a specified date, with the applicant then having the opportunity to respond. The matter was to be relisted for directions as to remedies before a Senior Member of the Tribunal. The orders made by the Tribunal addressed the breaches found and set out a process for determining appropriate remedies for the applicant.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Limitation Periods
-
Admissibility of Evidence
-
Res Judicata
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Confidentiality
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Webb v Port Stephens Council [2025] NSWCATAD 191
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Webb v Port Stephens Council
[2025] NSWCATAD 191
FZZ v Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water
[2024] NSWCATAD 131
Webb v iCare NSW
[2023] NSWCATAD 111
Cases Cited
15
Statutory Material Cited
4
BVV v Commissioner of Police
[2021] NSWCATAD 250
CDV v Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District
[2016] NSWCATAD 302
CEU v University of Technology Sydney
[2018] NSWCATAD 13