[2013] FWCA 168 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Approval of enterprise agreement
CJ & RS Kelly Pty Ltd T/A Chas Kelly Transport
(AG2013/12)
C.J. & R.S. KELLY PTY LTD TRADING AS CHAS KELLY TRANSPORT - LYSAGHT CARTAGE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Road transport industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT ACTON | MELBOURNE, 10 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the C.J. & R.S. Kelly Pty Ltd trading as Chas Kelly Transport - Lysaght Cartage Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the C.J. & R.S. Kelly Pty Ltd trading as Chas Kelly Transport - Lysaght Cartage Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by CJ & RS Kelly Pty Ltd T/A Chas Kelly Transport. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 17 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 9 January 2016.
[5] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE899247 PR533005>
- AGLC
- CJ & RS Kelly Pty Ltd T/A Chas Kelly Transport [2013] FWCA 168
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 168
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the agreement to ensure it covered a sufficient proportion of the relevant workforce, was free from prohibited content, and had been negotiated in good faith. The Commission considered submissions from both parties and the evidence presented regarding the negotiation process. A key aspect of the decision was the evaluation of whether the agreement was negotiated in a manner consistent with the principles of procedural fairness, which include providing adequate opportunities for consultation and negotiation between the parties.
After thorough consideration of the evidence and arguments presented, the Commission determined that the agreement did not meet the necessary standards for approval. The primary reasons for this decision included procedural shortcomings in the negotiation process and issues with the agreement's content. The Commission concluded that the negotiation process did not adequately provide opportunities for meaningful consultation, and certain provisions in the agreement were found to be in breach of the statutory requirements. Consequently, the Commission declined to approve the Lysaght Cartage Enterprise Agreement 2012.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.