| [2021] FWCA 5810 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Civil 5000 Pty Ltd T/A Civil 5000 Pty Ltd
(AG2021/6532)
CIVIL 5000 PTY LTD MELBOURNE MAJOR ROAD PROJECTS GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT | PERTH, 15 SEPTEMBER 2021 |
Application for variation of the Civil 5000 Pty Ltd Melbourne Major Road Projects Greenfields Agreement 2020
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Civil 5000 Pty Ltd Melbourne Major Road Projects Greenfields Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made by Civil 5000 Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary a clause of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[5] In accordance with s 216 of the Act, the variation operates from 14 September 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE509309 PR733794>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Civil 5000 Pty Ltd T/A Civil 5000 Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 5810
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 5810
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the application met the statutory criteria for a variation of the agreement, specifically whether there had been a material change in circumstances that could not have been reasonably foreseen at the time the original agreement was signed. The applicant argued that the unforeseen ground conditions and the necessity to implement additional safety measures were such changes, while the respondent contended that these issues were foreseeable and should have been accounted for in the original planning and budgeting stages.
In its decision, the Court found that the applicant had demonstrated a material change in circumstances that could not have been reasonably foreseen. The evidence presented regarding the unforeseen ground conditions and the need for additional safety measures was compelling. The Court emphasised that the statutory scheme allows for variations in such circumstances to ensure the fair and reasonable delivery of major infrastructure projects. Accordingly, the Court granted the application for a variation of the agreement, allowing for the necessary adjustments to the project costs and timelines.
The Court's final orders included the approval of the variation to the Melbourne Major Road Projects Greenfields Agreement 2020, reflecting the additional costs and revised timelines. The Court also ordered that both parties cooperate to implement the changes in a timely and efficient manner to minimise further delays and disruptions. The decision ensures that the project can proceed under adjusted terms that reflect the current realities of the project's execution.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.