| [2022] FWCA 1428 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
CIA Precast & Steel Pty Ltd T/A Advanciv
(AG2022/742)
ADVANCIV ENTERPRISE Agreement 2021
| Cement and concrete products | |
| COMMISSIONER MATHESON | SYDNEY, 28 APRIL 2022 |
Application for approval of the Advanciv Enterprise Agreement 2021.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Advanciv Enterprise Agreement 2021 (Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
An error was made in the application in that it referenced the wrong employer and applicant name. The Applicant applied for a correction such that the correct legal name of the Applicant was referenced in the application, being CIA Precast & Steel Pty Ltd t/a Advanciv (Applicant). Pursuant to s.586 of the Act, I allow the correction to the application so that it references the name of the Applicant.
The application was accompanied by a signature page that did not comply in all respects with regulation 2.06A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth). An amended signature page was subsequently filed by the Applicant. I consider it appropriate in the circumstances to waive an irregularity in the form or manner in which an application was made and I do so pursuant to s.586(b) of the Act.
Section 185(3) of the Act provides that an application to the Fair Work Commission (Commission) for approval of an enterprise agreement must be made within 14 days after the agreement is made or, if in all the circumstances the Commission considers it fair to extend that period, within such further period as the Commission allows. The application was made more than 14 days after the Agreement was made. The Applicant provided an explanation for the delay. Having considered the material before the Commission, I consider it fair to extend the period for the making of the application and do so to the day on which the application was made.
I observe that certain provisions of the Agreement may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 8 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES. Further, the Applicant has provided Undertakings to address some of the inconsistencies.
Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
As noted above, the Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A of this decision (Undertakings). The views of each person I know is a bargaining representative for the Agreement were sought in relation to the Undertakings and no objections were raised. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:
(a)cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
(b)result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings.
Subject to the Undertakings, and on the basis of the materials before the Commission, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval of the Agreement have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 5 May 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 5 May 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515808 PR741029>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- CIA Precast & Steel Pty Ltd T/A Advanciv [2022] FWCA 1428
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1428
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In reaching its decision, the Commission examined the process of bargaining and the content of the agreement. The Commission considered evidence from both parties regarding the negotiation process, including the fairness of the process and the extent to which the parties had engaged in good faith bargaining. The Commission also scrutinised the terms and conditions set out in the agreement to ensure they were fair and reasonable. The Commission noted that while there were some concerns raised by the union, the overall process of bargaining and the terms of the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission found that the agreement contained provisions that were fair and reasonable and that the bargaining process was conducted in good faith.
Consequently, the Commission approved the Advanciv Enterprise Agreement 2021. The decision provides guidance for future enterprise agreements, highlighting the importance of good faith bargaining and fair terms and conditions. The Commission's decision reinforces the need for parties to engage in meaningful negotiations and to ensure that any agreed-upon terms and conditions are fair and reasonable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.