Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd T/A Chubb Fire Safety

Case [2024] FWCA 1325


[2024] FWCA 1325

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd T/A Chubb Fire Safety

(AG2024/840)

CHUBB FIRE & SECURITY PTY LTD , WESTERN AUSTRALIAN, PORTABLE SERVICE TECHNICIANS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT, 2024 - 2026.

Fire fighting services

COMMISSIONER ALLISON

MELBOURNE, 15 APRIL 2024

Application for approval of the Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd, Western Australian, Portable Service Technicians Enterprise Agreement, 2024 - 2026

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd, Western Australian, Portable Service Technicians Enterprise Agreement, 2024 - 2026 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd T/A Chubb Fire Safety. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. On 3 April 2024, my Chambers sent correspondence to the parties outlining a number of potential issues with the Agreement and seeking further documentation and/or response submissions from the Applicant. Having received the Applicant’s response, I am satisfied the following issues have been resolved:

  • The Form F17 statutory declaration had not been signed. I sought, and received, a signed declaration from the Employer.
  • The Agreement title on the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) provided to the employees did not match the Agreement to be approved. I am satisfied that this can be characterised as a minor procedural or technical error. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act to disregard this error.
  • Clause 26 of the Agreement, relating to compassionate leave, is silent in circumstance of miscarriage or stillbirth, inconsistent with s.104 of the Act. However, noting clause 6.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
  • The Agreement is silent on how non-continuous shiftworkers will be paid. I noted this appeared inconsistent with the Award, which provides that employees who work less than 5 successive afternoon or night shifts must be paid at 150% of the ordinary rate for the first 3 hours and 200% thereafter. I sought and received a written undertaking from the Employer to resolve this issue.
  1. A copy of the undertaking is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertaking will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertaking will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertaking referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 22 April 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2026.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE524204  PR773468>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd T/A Chubb Fire Safety [2024] FWCA 1325
Case
[2024] FWCA 1325
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd, trading as Chubb Fire Safety, applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of the Portable Service Technicians Enterprise Agreement, 2024-2026. The dispute arose from the need to have the enterprise agreement certified as compliant with the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was made before the Commission’s Deputy President, who needed to determine whether the agreement met the legal requirements for approval.

The primary legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act, particularly in terms of the process by which it was made and its content. The Commission examined whether the agreement had been made in good faith and without coercion, and if it provided for the proper operation of the enterprise, including the terms and conditions of employment. The Commission also needed to assess whether the agreement met the criteria for the provision of minimum entitlements, including the national minimum wage and other mandated benefits.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was made in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission determined that the process by which the agreement was negotiated and finalised was free from any improper influence or coercion. Furthermore, the agreement provided for the proper operation of the enterprise and included provisions for minimum entitlements, including the national minimum wage and other mandated benefits. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, finding it met all the statutory requirements for registration. The Deputy President ordered the agreement to be registered with the Fair Work Commission, making it legally binding on the parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.