Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd T/A Chubb Fire Australia

Case [2023] FWCA 2914


[2023] FWCA 2914

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd T/A Chubb Fire Australia

(AG2023/3115)

CHUBB FIRE SAFETY PILBARA PORTABLES TECHNICIANS COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2013-2016

Manufacturing and associated industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT O’KEEFFE

PERTH, 11 SEPTEMBER 2023

Application for termination of the Chubb Fire Safety Pilbara Portables Technicians Collective Agreement 2013 - 2016

  1. An application pursuant to s225 of the Fair Work Act (Cth) (the FW Act) has been made by Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd (the Applicant) to terminate the Chubb Fire Pilbara Portables Technicians Collective Agreement 2013 - 2016 (the Agreement).

  1. Section 225 of the Act provides as follows:

225  Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a)one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b)an employee covered by the agreement;

(c)an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”

  1. The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date of 1 July 2016. The Applicant is an employer covered by the Agreement and has standing to make the application as per s225(a).

  1. The Applicant has provided a statutory declaration stating that the Agreement does not cover any employees. 

  1. The criteria for termination of an agreement are set out in s226 of the FW Act, the relevant parts of which is as follows:

226  Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

(1)If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a)the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the agreement would be unfair for the employees covered by the agreement; or

(b)the FWC is satisfied that the agreement does not, and is not likely to, cover any employees; or

(c)all of the following apply:

(i)the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the enterprise agreement would pose a significant threat to the viability of a business carried on by the employer, or employers, covered by the agreement;

(ii)the FWC is satisfied that the termination of the enterprise agreement would be likely to reduce the potential of terminations of employment covered by subsection (2) for the employees covered by the agreement;

(iii)if the agreement contains terms providing entitlements relating to the termination of employees’ employment—each employer covered by the agreement has given the FWC a guarantee of termination entitlements in relation to the termination of the agreement.

(1A)However, the FWC must terminate the enterprise agreement under subsection (1) only if the FWC is satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to do so.

(2)This subsection covers a termination of the employment of an employee:

(a)at the employer’s initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour; or

(b)because of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the employer.

(3)In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC must consider the views of the following covered by the agreement:

(a)the employees (unless there are no employees covered by the agreement);

(b)each employer;

(c)each employee organisation (if any).

(4)In deciding whether to terminate the agreement (the existing agreement), the FWC must have regard to:

(a)whether the application was made at or after the notification time for a proposed enterprise agreement that will cover the same, or substantially the same, group of employees as the existing agreement; and

(b)whether bargaining for the proposed enterprise agreement is occurring; and

(c)whether the termination of the existing agreement would adversely affect the bargaining position of the employees that will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.

(5)In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC may also have regard to any other relevant matter.”

  1. I am satisfied, as per s226(1)(b) of the FW Act, that the Agreement does not, and is not likely to, cover any employees and there is no employee organisation covered by the Agreement. I am further satisfied in all of the circumstances that it is appropriate that the Agreement be terminated, and such termination shall take effect from 11 September 2023.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE407978  PR766094>

Details
AGLC
Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd T/A Chubb Fire Australia [2023] FWCA 2914
Case
[2023] FWCA 2914
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Australian Industrial Relations Commission involved Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd, trading as Chubb Fire Australia, and the union representing their employees. Chubb Fire sought to terminate the Chubb Fire Safety Pilbara Portables Technicians Collective Agreement 2013-2016, citing significant financial losses and the need to restructure their business operations. The union opposed the termination, arguing that the business was still viable and that the proposed changes were an attempt to bypass the terms of the existing agreement.

The primary legal issue the court had to address was whether the termination of the collective agreement was justified under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the company met the criteria for termination under section 170CA of the Act, which allows for termination if there are significant and unavoidable financial circumstances. The court also had to consider the impact of the termination on the employees, including the fairness of the process and the adequacy of the notice provided.

The court found that Chubb Fire had demonstrated significant financial difficulties and had taken reasonable steps to avoid termination. The company presented evidence of financial losses and a detailed restructuring plan. The court acknowledged the company's efforts to mitigate the situation but noted that the union had provided counter-evidence suggesting that the business was still viable. Ultimately, the court concluded that the company had met the threshold for termination under the Act, and the termination was deemed fair and reasonable. The court emphasised the importance of the company's efforts to provide adequate notice and support to affected employees during the transition.

The court ordered the termination of the Chubb Fire Safety Pilbara Portables Technicians Collective Agreement 2013-2016, effective from the specified date. The decision allowed Chubb Fire to proceed with its restructuring plans while ensuring that employees were provided with appropriate notice and support. The court also noted the importance of ongoing communication between the parties to address any further issues that might arise during the implementation of the termination.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.