Chranley and Smart (No 5)

In *Chranley and Smart (No 5)*, Dawe J considered applications concerning alleged contempt of court. The specific nature of the dispute and the parties involved beyond the named respondents are not detailed in the provided text.

The central legal issue before the court was the determination of the applications in contempt. Dawe J was required to consider and adjudicate upon these applications.

Dawe J indicated an intention to hear the applications in contempt together as a group. This procedural decision suggests a consolidation of the proceedings for efficiency or to address common issues. The reasoning behind this approach, or the legal principles applied in reaching this decision, are not elaborated upon in the provided text.

The court's final orders, as indicated, were that Dawe J proposed to hear the applications in contempt together as a group.