Choppair Helicopters Pty Ltd v Bobridge (No 2)

Case

[2018] FCA 700

18 May 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Choppair Helicopters Pty Ltd v Bobridge (No 2) [2018] FCA 700 [2018] FCA 700 18 May 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Choppair Helicopters Pty Ltd, along with associated companies, appealed a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia concerning claims by Ms Bobridge for accident make-up pay and specific superannuation payments under the Air Pilots Award 2010. The Federal Circuit Court had found in Ms Bobridge's favour on both claims, and the appeal was heard in the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. The primary legal issues before the court were whether the primary judge provided adequate reasons for finding Ms Bobridge entitled to accident make-up pay and specific superannuation payments, and if, upon redetermination, these claims were substantiated.

The Full Court found that the primary judge did not sufficiently justify the decision that Ms Bobridge was entitled to accident make-up pay, and therefore the claim in this regard failed. However, the court found that the primary judge did provide adequate reasons for the decision that Ms Bobridge was entitled to specific superannuation payments. Consequently, the court ordered that Ms Bobridge be paid $6,555.95 for accident make-up pay, to be sourced from the Court Litigants’ Fund. The remaining balance in the Court Litigants’ Fund was to be paid to Choppair. The appeal against the superannuation claim was dismissed, and the order regarding the accident make-up pay was set aside.

The court's decision included specific orders to ensure the payment of the accident make-up to Ms Bobridge and the distribution of any remaining funds in the Court Litigants’ Fund to Choppair. The orders made clear the responsibilities of the parties in executing these financial transfers, with detailed instructions given to the Registrar for the payment from the Court Litigants’ Fund to Ms Bobridge.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Industrial Law

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Breach of Contract

  • Compensatory Damages

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

8