Chilcotin Pty Ltd v Cenelage Pty Ltd
Case
•
[1999] NSWCA 11
•8 April 1999
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Chilcotin Pty Ltd v Cenelage Pty Ltd [1999] NSWCA 11
[1999] NSWCA 11
8 April 1999
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Chilcotin Pty Ltd (appellant) appealed to the New South Wales Court of Appeal against a decision of the primary judge concerning a dispute with Cenelage Pty Ltd (respondent). The nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text.
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the appellant should be permitted to raise a new point on appeal that had not been taken or pursued at the trial. This involved considering the circumstances under which an appellate court may depart from the course adopted by the parties at the trial.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellant was not permitted to take the new point on appeal. The reasoning applied was that it would be unjust to allow the appellant to depart from the course adopted at trial, implying that the respondent would be prejudiced by the introduction of a new argument at this stage. The court upheld the decision of the primary judge.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the appellant should be permitted to raise a new point on appeal that had not been taken or pursued at the trial. This involved considering the circumstances under which an appellate court may depart from the course adopted by the parties at the trial.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellant was not permitted to take the new point on appeal. The reasoning applied was that it would be unjust to allow the appellant to depart from the course adopted at trial, implying that the respondent would be prejudiced by the introduction of a new argument at this stage. The court upheld the decision of the primary judge.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Corso v Arias Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] SADC 62
Cases Citing This Decision
72
David & Ros Carr Holdings Pty Ltd v Ritossa
[2025] NSWCA 108
Williams Group Australia Pty Ltd v Crocker
[2016] NSWCA 265
Mamo v Surace
[2014] NSWCA 58
Cases Cited
14
Statutory Material Cited
0
Dearman v Dearman
[1908] HCA 84
Dearman v Dearman
[1908] HCA 84
DeVries v Australian National Railways Commission
[1993] HCA 78