Chief Executive Department of Justice and Attorney General v Keyte
Case
•
[2012] QCAT 244
•12 June 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Chief Executive Department of Justice and Attorney General v Keyte [2012] QCAT 244
[2012] QCAT 244
12 June 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Chief Executive Department of Justice and Attorney General brought proceedings against Robert Douglas Keyte, a real estate agent, for engaging in unlicensed activity and other breaches of the Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000. The dispute came before the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales. The Tribunal was tasked with determining whether Keyte was a suitable person to hold a licence, given his actions and the failure to lodge trust account audits. It also needed to decide if Keyte had been incompetent or acted in an unprofessional manner.
The Tribunal considered whether Keyte's actions, including acting as a real estate agent while unlicensed and borrowing a colleague's licence, constituted incompetence or unprofessional conduct. It also examined whether Keyte's failure to lodge trust account audits amounted to a breach of the Act, despite there being no loss to consumers. The Tribunal found that Keyte's conduct was indeed unprofessional and that he was not a suitable person to hold a licence. The Tribunal was satisfied that Keyte's actions warranted the severe penalty of disqualification from holding a licence for seven years.
The Tribunal issued several orders against Keyte. Firstly, it reprimanded him. Secondly, it disqualified him from holding a licence or registration certification for seven years. Thirdly, it barred him from being an Executive Officer of a corporation that holds a licence or registration certificate for the same period. Fourthly, it imposed a fine of $2,250, payable by a specific date. Lastly, Keyte was prohibited from reapplying for a real estate agent’s licence until he provided evidence of successfully completing the equivalent of a Certificate IV in Property Services (Real Estate).
The Tribunal considered whether Keyte's actions, including acting as a real estate agent while unlicensed and borrowing a colleague's licence, constituted incompetence or unprofessional conduct. It also examined whether Keyte's failure to lodge trust account audits amounted to a breach of the Act, despite there being no loss to consumers. The Tribunal found that Keyte's conduct was indeed unprofessional and that he was not a suitable person to hold a licence. The Tribunal was satisfied that Keyte's actions warranted the severe penalty of disqualification from holding a licence for seven years.
The Tribunal issued several orders against Keyte. Firstly, it reprimanded him. Secondly, it disqualified him from holding a licence or registration certification for seven years. Thirdly, it barred him from being an Executive Officer of a corporation that holds a licence or registration certificate for the same period. Fourthly, it imposed a fine of $2,250, payable by a specific date. Lastly, Keyte was prohibited from reapplying for a real estate agent’s licence until he provided evidence of successfully completing the equivalent of a Certificate IV in Property Services (Real Estate).
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Regulatory Law
-
Professional Discipline
Legal Concepts
-
Disqualification
-
Reprimand
-
Fine
-
Professional Conduct
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Chief Executive, Department of Justice and Attorney General v Dariush-Far [2016] QCAT 368
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
Craig v South Australia
[1995] HCA 58
Craig v South Australia
[1995] HCA 58
Craig v South Australia
[1995] HCA 58