Chi v Coles Supermarket Australia Pty Limited (EOD)

The case of Chi v Coles Supermarket Australia Pty Limited (EOD) involved an application by Chi to set aside consent orders that had been made in a deed of release. The dispute was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The main issue before the court was whether the consent orders, which had been made in the context of a deed of release, could be set aside and what effect this would have on the dismissal of Chi's complaints.

The court had to determine whether the consent orders could be set aside and if doing so would affect the tribunal's decision to dismiss Chi's complaints. Additionally, the court had to consider whether leave to appeal an interlocutory decision should be granted.

In its decision, the court held that the consent orders could not be set aside as they were not subject to being overturned by the tribunal. The court also held that the tribunal's decision to dismiss the complaints was correct and should be affirmed. The court refused leave to appeal the interlocutory decision, finding that it was not in the interests of justice to do so. The court also provided guidance on the procedure to be followed if either party wished to apply for costs.

The court's decision was final and binding, with the Appeal Panel to determine any application for costs on the papers in accordance with the relevant legislation. The tribunal's decision to dismiss the complaints was affirmed, and the consent orders were not set aside. The court's decision provides guidance on the procedure to be followed if either party wishes to apply for costs.