Chhibber and Kudva (No 2)

In *Chhibber and Kudva (No 2)*, heard before Macmillan J, the dispute concerned the admissibility of certain evidence. The applicants sought to have a USB copy of a television program, identified as ‘Media Program K’, admitted as an exhibit in the proceedings.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the USB copy of ‘Media Program K’ constituted admissible evidence. This required the Court to consider the rules of evidence, particularly concerning the admissibility of digital or electronic evidence and the proper procedure for marking and retaining such evidence.

Macmillan J ordered that the USB copy of ‘Media Program K’ be marked as Exhibit “W1” and retained on the Court file. This indicates the Court found the evidence admissible and followed the necessary steps for its formal admission and preservation within the court record.