| [2015] FWCA 8609 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
CHEP Australia Limited
(AG2015/7528)
CHEP BATHURST (NSW) SERVICE CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | SYDNEY, 15 DECEMBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the CHEP Bathurst (NSW) Service Centre Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the CHEP Bathurst (NSW) Service Centre Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by CHEP Australia Limited. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 15 December 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 22 December 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 November 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE417065 PR575000>
- AGLC
- CHEP Australia Limited [2015] FWCA 8609
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 8609
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the "better off overall test" (BOOT) and procedural fairness. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement provided employees with conditions at least as good as their previous conditions or the applicable award, and whether the process through which the agreement was formed was fair and appropriate.
After careful consideration, the Commission found that the agreement did indeed satisfy the BOOT, as the employees would be better off overall by accepting the proposed terms. The Commission also concluded that the process through which the agreement was negotiated and agreed upon was fair and appropriate, given the evidence presented. The application for approval was subsequently approved, and the CHEP Bathurst (NSW) Service Centre Enterprise Agreement 2015 was duly registered.
No additional orders were made by the Commission beyond the approval and registration of the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.