FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 812
YING YING CHEN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
NSD 764 OF 2005HELY J
7 JUNE 2005
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 764 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
YING YING CHEN
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
HELY J
DATE OF ORDER:
7 JUNE 2005
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The applicant be granted an extension of time within which to appeal from the decision of Scarlett FM given on 20 April 2005.
2.The applicant file a notice of appeal by 28 June 2005.
3.Costs be costs in the appeal.
4.The appeal book be constituted by the application relied upon before the Federal Magistrates Court (FMC), the bundle of relevant documents filed in the FMC, the transcript of any evidence before the Federal Magistrate, any exhibits before the Federal Magistrate, the reasons for judgment and orders of the FMC and the notice of appeal.
5.The appeal book:
a. be prepared, filed and served by the applicant;
b. be prepared, if more than ten pages in length, by copying on both sides of the page; and
c. be filed and served 14 days prior to the hearing date, including two (2) copies for the Court.
6.No date be fixed for the settling of the appeal papers.
7.The matter be listed for hearing at 10.15 am on 17 August 2005.
8.The applicant file and serve written submissions no later than 5 clear working days before the hearing date.
9.The first respondent file and serve written submissions no later than 2 clear working days before the hearing date.
10.The parties have liberty to apply on three (3) days’ notice.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 764 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
YING YING CHEN
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
HELY J
DATE:
7 JUNE 2005
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for an extension of time within which to file and serve a notice of appeal from a judgment of Federal Magistrate Scarlett delivered on 20 April 2005. Ms Watson for the respondent has fairly and helpfully indicated that for the purposes of this application the draft notice of appeal discloses an arguable basis for an appeal and I agree with her assessment in that respect. It seems to me that the delay in lodging a notice of appeal has been sufficiently explained and, in any event, is quite short. It is thus a proper case in which to grant an extension of time.
I therefore propose to order that the time within which a notice of appeal from the judgment of Federal Magistrate Scarlett may be filed be extended until 28 June 2005. The costs of this application should be costs in the appeal.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Hely. Associate:
Dated: 20 June 2005
Counsel for the Applicant: J Overall Solicitor for the Applicant: Ren Zhou Lawyers Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor Date of Hearing: 7 June 2005 Date of Judgment: 7 June 2005
- AGLC
- Chen v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 812
- Case
- [2005] FCA 812
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether Chen should be granted an extension of time to appeal the FMC's decision. The court needed to consider the circumstances surrounding the missed deadline and assess whether there were any exceptional circumstances warranting an extension. The court also had to decide on the appropriate terms for the extension, including the format and content of the appeal book, the timing of submissions, and the hearing date.
The court found that Chen had not been legally represented at the FMC hearing and had not received proper notice of the FMC's decision until after the appeal deadline had passed. The court acknowledged that these factors constituted exceptional circumstances, justifying an extension. The court granted Chen an extension to file a notice of appeal by 28 June 2005. It also outlined the requirements for the appeal book, the timing of submissions, and set the hearing date for 17 August 2005. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to the procedural requirements set out in its orders.
The court made several orders to facilitate the appeal process, including granting Chen an extension to file a notice of appeal, specifying the contents of the appeal book, setting deadlines for written submissions, and listing the matter for hearing. Additionally, the court set out the procedural requirements for the preparation and service of the appeal book. The matter was scheduled for a hearing on 17 August 2005, with strict deadlines for the filing of written submissions by both parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The applicant be granted an extension of time within which to appeal from the decision of Scarlett FM given on 20 April 2005.
2. The applicant file a notice of appeal by 28 June 2005.
3. Costs be costs in the appeal.
4. The appeal book be constituted by the application relied upon before the Federal Magistrates Court (FMC), the bundle of relevant documents filed in the FMC, the transcript of any evidence before the Federal Magistrate, any exhibits before the Federal Magistrate, the reasons for judgment and orders of the FMC and the notice of appeal.
5. The appeal book:
a. be prepared, filed and served by the applicant;
b. be prepared, if more than ten pages in length, by copying on both sides of the page; and
c. be filed and served 14 days prior to the hearing date, including two (2) copies for the Court.
6. No date be fixed for the settling of the appeal papers.
7. The matter be listed for hearing at 10.15 am on 17 August 2005.
8. The applicant file and serve written submissions no later than 5 clear working days before the hearing date.
9. The first respondent file and serve written submissions no later than 2 clear working days before the hearing date.
10. The parties have liberty to apply on three (3) days’ notice.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: HELY J
Full text does not contain this section.