Chen v Lym International
Case
•
[2009] NSWCA 121
•26 May 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Chen v Lym International [2009] NSWCA 121
[2009] NSWCA 121
26 May 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Chen v Lym International*, the dispute concerned an application for a stay of a judgment pending the determination of an appeal. The trial judge had ordered the defendant to transfer property. The parties disagreed on whether substantial stamp duty would be payable upon the transfer and, crucially, upon a potential re-transfer if the defendant's appeal was successful. The application before the court was to determine whether the defendant's appeal had reasonable prospects of success and whether the balance of convenience favoured granting a stay, along with appropriate interim orders for the management and marketing of the property.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the defendant's appeal had reasonable prospects of success and whether the balance of convenience favoured the grant of a stay of the judgment. The court was also required to consider what interim orders should be made regarding the management and marketing of the property while the appeal was pending.
Beazley JA considered the prospects of success of the defendant's appeal and the balance of convenience. The court ultimately ordered that the stay previously granted in the matter would continue until further order. Directions were also given for the parties to file submissions regarding the appointment of a receiver for the property or its ongoing marketing pending the determination of the appeal.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the defendant's appeal had reasonable prospects of success and whether the balance of convenience favoured the grant of a stay of the judgment. The court was also required to consider what interim orders should be made regarding the management and marketing of the property while the appeal was pending.
Beazley JA considered the prospects of success of the defendant's appeal and the balance of convenience. The court ultimately ordered that the stay previously granted in the matter would continue until further order. Directions were also given for the parties to file submissions regarding the appointment of a receiver for the property or its ongoing marketing pending the determination of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Costs
-
Injunction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
D'Anastasi v Environment Protection Authority (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 268
Cases Citing This Decision
28
Di Liristi v Matautia Developments Pty Ltd
[2021] NSWCA 163
Mao v AMP Superannuation Limited
[2017] NSWCA 296
Majak v Rose (No 4)
[2017] NSWCA 170
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
3
Lym International Pty Ltd v Chen
[2009] NSWSC 98
Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd
[2002] NSWCA 383
Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd
[2002] NSWCA 383