Chen, J.H. v Minister for Immigration Local Government & Ethnic Affairs

Case [1990] FCA 302


I _;

302. 70, I
JUDGMENT No. .. ....... ..l. ........ ,-_,

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) , .
1
NEW SOUTH WAGES DISTRICT REGISTRY NO. NG 279 of 1990
) f ~~
GENERAL DIVISION ) r- ,
I,,
. .
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF . .
THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA I
BETWEEN:  JIN HUI CHEN
Appellant -.
. .
i.1

MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION

LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND ETHNIC .
S . I-., ,
AFFAIRS I
I
l -
Respondent 1':
LOCKHART, WILCOX, HILL JJ RECEIVED
1 JUNE 1990 -3 JUL1990

RDERAL COURT OF

AUSTRALIA

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT REGISTRY

LOCKHART J:

On 25 May this year an application was filed with this Court seeking the review of the decision of the delegate of the respondent that the applicant be deported from Australia and certain related decisions. The matter was heard by a single judge of this court yesterday when his Honour dismissed the application with costs. A notice of appeal has today been filed in court by the appellant appealing from the whole of the learned primary Judge's judgment.

The court heard the matter this afternoon and has

taken the step of dealing with the matter urgently as did the prlmary Judge because of the imminence of the proposed departure from Australia of the applicant pursuant to the deportation order made by the respondent's delegate which unless set aside or unless the respondent is otherwise restrained will result in the departure of the appellant from Australia tomorrow.

Counsel for the appellant has argued in substance the matter on the same footing as it was argued before the primary Judge, though it would seem with certain differences of emphasis. All that could be said in support of the appeal has in our view been said by counsel for the appellant.

The court is of the opinion that no error has been demonstrated in the reasons for judgment of the primary Judge. Indeed, the court agrees generally With those reasons.

The appeal is dismissed with costs.

I certify that this and the preceding one

(1) page are a true copy of the reasons

for judgment herein of the Honourable Mr

Justice Lockhart.

.

I

Associate - -
Dated: 1 June 1990 3
Details
AGLC
Chen, J.H. v Minister for Immigration Local Government & Ethnic Affairs [1990] FCA 302
Case
[1990] FCA 302
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Jin Hui Chen sought judicial review of a decision by the Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs to deport him from Australia. The matter was initially heard by a single judge of the Federal Court who dismissed Chen's application. Chen then appealed that decision to a full bench of the Federal Court, namely Lockhart, Wilcox and Hill JJ. The appeal was heard urgently due to Chen's impending departure from Australia. Counsel for Chen argued the same grounds as were presented to the primary judge, though with some differences in emphasis. The court found that no error had been demonstrated in the primary judge's reasons and dismissed the appeal with costs.

The key legal issues before the court were whether the Minister's delegate had acted lawfully in making the deportation order and whether the primary judge had erred in dismissing Chen's application for judicial review. The court examined the reasons provided by the Minister's delegate and found that they were lawful. The court also found that the primary judge had not erred in dismissing Chen's application and that his Honour's reasons were sound.

The court agreed with the primary judge's analysis that the Minister's delegate had correctly exercised his discretion in making the deportation order. The court found that the delegate had appropriately considered all relevant factors and that there were no procedural errors. The court also found that the primary judge had correctly applied the relevant legal principles in dismissing Chen's application for judicial review. The appeal was dismissed with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.