| [2023] FWC 169 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.365 - Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal
Chelsea Simpson
v
Automotive Imports Proprietary Limited
(C2022/6358)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE | MELBOURNE, 20 JANUARY 2023 |
Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal – application dismissed.
Chelsea Simpson (applicant) has made an application under s 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The applicant alleges that they were dismissed in contravention of the general protection provisions in Part 3-1 of the Act.
The application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) (regulations) or by a completed application for waiver of the filing fee (waiver application). The applicant has not responded to correspondence from the Commission alerting them to this deficiency, nor has the deficiency been rectified. I have decided to dismiss the application for the following reasons.
Context
The application was filed on 15 September 2022, being filed by the applicant’s representative.
On 16 September 2022, the Commission emailed correspondence to the applicant’s nominated email address advising that the application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver application. The email put the applicant on notice that the application may be dismissed in the absence of compliance.
An SMS notification was also sent to the applicant’s nominated telephone number on 19 September 2022. The SMS advised the applicant to take action in compliance with the 16 September 2022 email from the Commission.
On 29 September 2022, the applicant emailed the Commission asking if the application remained open.
On 30 September 2022, the Commission emailed correspondence to the applicant’s nominated email address advising that the application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver application to proceed. The correspondence instructed the applicant on how to pay the filing fee or make a waiver application and put the applicant on notice the application may be dismissed in the absence of compliance.
The Commission attempted to call the applicant on 4 October 2022. The call was not answered. A voicemail message was left advising that the filing fee remained unpaid and the application was at risk of being dismissed.
On 19 January 2023, the Commission made an attempt to call the applicant unsuccessfully.
To date, the applicant has not paid the filing fee or filed a completed waiver application.
Legislative framework
In relation to an application made pursuant to s 365 of the Act, s 367(1) provides that the application “must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.” At the time the application was made, the regulations prescribed a fee of $77.80. The regulations also allow for an application to be made for the fee to be waived.
Section 587 of the Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.
…
(2) Despite paragraphs (1) (b) and (c), the FWC must not dismiss an application under section 365 or 773 on the ground that the application:
(a) is frivolous or vexatious; or
(b) has no reasonable prospects of success.
(3) The FWC may dismiss an application:
(a) on its own initiative; or
(b) on application.
Consideration and conclusion
The applicant has neither paid the filing fee nor sought a fee waiver. Accordingly, the application is not made in accordance with s 367 of the Act.
The applicant has taken no action to address the deficiency despite being notified of it by the Commission on multiple occasions. In these circumstances, I have decided to exercise my discretion to dismiss the application in accordance with s 587(1)(a) of the Act.
The application is dismissed.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR749827>
- AGLC
- Chelsea Simpson v Automotive Imports Proprietary Limited [2023] FWC 169
- Case
- [2023] FWC 169
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The main legal issue was whether the application complied with section 367 of the Fair Work Act, which requires the application to be accompanied by the prescribed filing fee or a completed fee waiver application. The applicant did not pay the fee or seek a waiver and did not respond to notifications from the Commission. The Deputy President exercised their discretion under section 587 of the Act to dismiss the application for not being made in accordance with the Act.
The Deputy President considered that the applicant was notified of the deficiency multiple times but did not take any action to comply. In these circumstances, the Deputy President decided to dismiss the application in accordance with section 587(1)(a) of the Act. The application was dismissed with no orders made in favour of the applicant.
The Deputy President dismissed Chelsea Simpson's application under section 365 of the Fair Work Act for failing to comply with the requirement to accompany the application with the prescribed filing fee or a completed fee waiver application. The applicant was notified of the deficiency multiple times but did not take any action to rectify the issue. In exercising their discretion under section 587 of the Act, the Deputy President decided to dismiss the application for not being made in accordance with the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.