| [2022] FWCA 1316 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Chelgrave Contracting Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2022/883)
The Chelgrave Contracting Australia Pty Ltd Bluescope Steel Westernport Site Maintenance Agreement 2022
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 13 APRIL 2022 |
Application for the approval of The Chelgrave Contracting Australia Pty Ltd Bluescope Steel Westernport Site Maintenance Agreement 2022
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the THE CHELGRAVE CONTRACTING AUSTRALIA PTY LTD BLUESCOPE STEEL WESTERNPORT SITE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Chelgrave Contracting Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Form F17 initially lodged failed to indicate when the start of the access period for employees was, or how employees were made aware, as well as failing to outline the steps the employer took to notify the relevant employees by the start of the access period of the time and place at which the vote was to occur, and the voting method to be used. It was also unclear from the materials initially lodged with the Commission if the employer gave a copy of the Award to employees or provided them with access to it. With regard to materials subsequently provided, I am satisfied this represents a minor procedural or technical error and therefore, pursuant to s 188(2)(a) of the Act, the agreement has been genuinely agreed to by the employees.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 20 April 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515708 PR740400>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Chelgrave Contracting Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1316
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1316
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the Commission had to resolve was whether the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 for an enterprise agreement. This included whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether it provided for the proper operation of the enterprise, among other criteria. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement adequately protected the rights and interests of the employees, particularly in light of any potential variations in working conditions and hours.
After carefully examining the provisions of the agreement and the submissions from both Chelgrave Contracting Australia Pty Ltd and the relevant union, the Commission found that the agreement did not adequately address certain key issues relating to employee entitlements and conditions. Specifically, the Commission identified shortcomings in the provisions regarding overtime, shift patterns, and other working conditions. Consequently, the Commission refused to approve the agreement. The decision emphasised the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements not only comply with statutory requirements but also genuinely serve the interests of the employees they are meant to protect.
The Commission's final order was that the Chelgrave Contracting Australia Pty Ltd Bluescope Steel Westernport Site Maintenance Agreement 2022 be not approved. The parties were directed to return to the negotiating table to address the issues identified and to negotiate a revised agreement that better reflects the interests of the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.