| [2014] FWCA 9300 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Cheetham Salt Limited
(AG2014/10234)
CHEETHAM SALT LIMITED - SEA LAKE AND WAKOOL - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Salt industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEWIN | MELBOURNE, 18 DECEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Cheetham Salt Limited - Sea Lake and Wakool - Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cheetham Salt Limited - Sea Lake and Wakool - Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application has been made by the Cheetham Salt Limited. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The application for approval of this Agreement was filed by Ms Sarah Dalziel of the Cheetham Salt Limited on 10 December 2014.
[3] The Agreement does not appear to contain a consultation term that meets the requirements of ss 205(1) and (1A) of the Act and r 2.09 and Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009. Accordingly, pursuant to s 205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term, as attached to this decision as Attachment A, is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s 201(2), I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate seven days from the date of approval of the Agreement by the Fair Work Commission. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 August 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Attachment A:
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code {J}, AE411924 PR559385>
- AGLC
- Cheetham Salt Limited [2014] FWCA 9300
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 9300
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the delegate had to resolve was whether the agreement complied with the procedural requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act. This included whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for the proper classification and remuneration of employees. Additionally, the delegate needed to assess if the agreement met the minimum standards prescribed by the Fair Work Act.
The delegate considered the evidence presented by both parties and examined the terms of the agreement. The delegate found that the agreement was made in good faith, included proper classification and remuneration provisions, and met the minimum standards. The delegate concluded that the agreement complied with the statutory requirements for approval. Consequently, the delegate approved the Enterprise Agreement, and the application was successful.
The delegate's decision was that the 2014 Enterprise Agreement between Cheetham Salt Limited and Sea Lake and Wakool employees was approved. The agreement would now be registered with the Fair Work Commission, and the terms would apply to the employees covered by the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.