Chard and Yong (No 2)

Case

[2019] FamCA 948

9 December 2019


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Chard and Yong (No 2) [2019] FamCA 948 [2019] FamCA 948 9 December 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Chard and Yong (No 2)*, Gill J considered an application in proceedings involving the Father and the Mother. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed, but the orders indicate it concerns matters requiring a trial and involves an Independent Children's Lawyer.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether section 102NA of the relevant legislation applied to the hearing, which would preclude personal cross-examination. The court also had to determine the procedural steps and timelines for the filing of evidence and the conduct of the trial.

The court determined that section 102NA did apply, meaning personal cross-examination would not be permitted. The court then made detailed orders regarding the filing of consolidated affidavits by both the Father and the Mother, setting specific deadlines for their service. Further directions were given for the Father to notify the other parties if he intended to rely on previously filed witness material, and for the filing of responding affidavits. The court also stipulated that parties would generally be restricted to relying on affidavit material filed in accordance with these orders, with limited exceptions. Subpoenas were to be made returnable no later than 28 days before the trial, and further trial directions were scheduled.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Family Law

Legal Concepts

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Discovery

  • Stay of Proceedings

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

Hurley & Melton (No 2) [2020] FamCA 917
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

3