Channing and Snow
Case
•
[2018] FCCA 367
•23 February 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Channing and Snow [2018] FCCA 367
[2018] FCCA 367
23 February 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned parenting orders made by Judge Jones in relation to the children X and Y. The dispute involved the arrangements for the children's living arrangements, time spent with each parent, communication, and other aspects of their care.
The court was required to determine the specific orders concerning equal shared parental responsibility, the children's living arrangements on a fortnightly basis during school terms, and the allocation of time during school holidays, including specific arrangements for Easter, Halloween, Christmas, and birthdays. Further issues included provisions for communication between the children and each parent, the use of a mobile phone, travel arrangements, extracurricular activities, and injunctions relating to the children's welfare and the parents' conduct. The court also addressed the requirement for both parents to attend specific programs.
Judge Jones ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders and established a detailed schedule for the children's time with each parent, including equal shared parental responsibility. The orders stipulated specific living arrangements, holiday allocations, and communication protocols, including the provision of a mobile phone for the children. Injunctions were imposed to prevent certain behaviours, such as leaving children unattended in vehicles or taking them to work. The court also mandated family therapy and required both parents to enrol in and complete specific programs, with costs for therapy to be shared equally. Provisions were made for overseas travel, access to medical and educational records, and the obtaining of passports and dual citizenship for the children.
The court was required to determine the specific orders concerning equal shared parental responsibility, the children's living arrangements on a fortnightly basis during school terms, and the allocation of time during school holidays, including specific arrangements for Easter, Halloween, Christmas, and birthdays. Further issues included provisions for communication between the children and each parent, the use of a mobile phone, travel arrangements, extracurricular activities, and injunctions relating to the children's welfare and the parents' conduct. The court also addressed the requirement for both parents to attend specific programs.
Judge Jones ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders and established a detailed schedule for the children's time with each parent, including equal shared parental responsibility. The orders stipulated specific living arrangements, holiday allocations, and communication protocols, including the provision of a mobile phone for the children. Injunctions were imposed to prevent certain behaviours, such as leaving children unattended in vehicles or taking them to work. The court also mandated family therapy and required both parents to enrol in and complete specific programs, with costs for therapy to be shared equally. Provisions were made for overseas travel, access to medical and educational records, and the obtaining of passports and dual citizenship for the children.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Channing and Snow [2018] FCCA 367
Cases Citing This Decision
0