Channing and Snow

Case

[2018] FCCA 367

23 February 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Channing and Snow [2018] FCCA 367 [2018] FCCA 367 23 February 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned parenting orders made by Judge Jones in relation to the children X and Y. The dispute involved the arrangements for the children's living arrangements, time spent with each parent, communication, and other aspects of their care.

The court was required to determine the specific orders concerning equal shared parental responsibility, the children's living arrangements on a fortnightly basis during school terms, and the allocation of time during school holidays, including specific arrangements for Easter, Halloween, Christmas, and birthdays. Further issues included provisions for communication between the children and each parent, the use of a mobile phone, travel arrangements, extracurricular activities, and injunctions relating to the children's welfare and the parents' conduct. The court also addressed the requirement for both parents to attend specific programs.

Judge Jones ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders and established a detailed schedule for the children's time with each parent, including equal shared parental responsibility. The orders stipulated specific living arrangements, holiday allocations, and communication protocols, including the provision of a mobile phone for the children. Injunctions were imposed to prevent certain behaviours, such as leaving children unattended in vehicles or taking them to work. The court also mandated family therapy and required both parents to enrol in and complete specific programs, with costs for therapy to be shared equally. Provisions were made for overseas travel, access to medical and educational records, and the obtaining of passports and dual citizenship for the children.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

Legal Concepts

  • Injunction

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

2

MRR v GR [2010] HCA 4