Chang (Migration)
Case
•
[2019] AATA 1888
•12 June 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Chang (Migration) [2019] AATA 1888
[2019] AATA 1888
12 June 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa, reviewed by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The applicant sought to challenge the decision not to grant the visa.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant satisfied the criteria for a Subclass 500 visa, specifically the requirement under clause 500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations that the applicant be enrolled in a full-time registered course of study at the time of the decision.
The Tribunal reasoned that the definition of a "course of study" required enrolment in a "full-time registered course," which in turn necessitated the course provider being registered under the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000. As there was no evidence before the Tribunal demonstrating the applicant's current enrolment in such a course, the Tribunal was not satisfied that clause 500.211 was met. Consequently, the Tribunal found that the applicant did not satisfy the criteria for the visa.
The Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant satisfied the criteria for a Subclass 500 visa, specifically the requirement under clause 500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations that the applicant be enrolled in a full-time registered course of study at the time of the decision.
The Tribunal reasoned that the definition of a "course of study" required enrolment in a "full-time registered course," which in turn necessitated the course provider being registered under the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000. As there was no evidence before the Tribunal demonstrating the applicant's current enrolment in such a course, the Tribunal was not satisfied that clause 500.211 was met. Consequently, the Tribunal found that the applicant did not satisfy the criteria for the visa.
The Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Chang (Migration) [2019] AATA 1888
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Huo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
[2002] FCA 617
Manna v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
[2012] FMCA 28
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li
[2013] HCA 18