CHAKROUN & BILEL

The parties to this proceeding were CHAKROUN & BILEL, the applicants, and the respondent, whose identity is not specified in the provided text. The dispute concerned an application for an interlocutory injunction. The matter was heard by Kemp J in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The central legal issue before the court was whether to grant an interlocutory injunction. This required the court to consider the established principles for the grant of such relief, namely whether the applicants had established a strong arguable case, whether damages would be an inadequate remedy for the apprehended wrong, and where the overall balance of convenience lay.

Kemp J applied the well-settled principles governing interlocutory injunctions. His Honour considered the evidence presented by the parties in relation to each limb of the test. The decision would have turned on His Honour's assessment of the likelihood of the applicants succeeding at trial and the potential for irreparable harm if the injunction were not granted, weighed against any prejudice to the respondent.

The provided text does not specify the final orders or outcome of the application.