[2014] FWCA 256 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Central Canberra Family Day Care
(AG2013/10543)
CENTRAL CANBERRA FAMILY DAY CARE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Children's services | |
COMMISSIONER DEEGAN | CANBERRA, 9 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Central Canberra Family Day Care Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Central Canberra Family Day Care Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) by Central Canberra Family Day Care. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] Pursuant to s.190 of the Act I have accepted an undertaking from the employer which relates to the classification and remuneration of residential based family day care workers of the agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to this decision at Annexure A.
[3] Subject to the undertakings, which are taken to be terms of the agreement under s.201(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 January 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 9 January 2018.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE406317 PR546676>
- AGLC
- Central Canberra Family Day Care [2014] FWCA 256
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 256
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Fair Work Commission adhered to procedural fairness in its decision-making process and if the agreement's terms were appropriate. The applicants argued that the Commission's decision was flawed due to procedural unfairness and that certain provisions of the agreement were unreasonable. The Commission needed to assess these claims against the legal standards of procedural fairness and the appropriateness of the agreement's content.
The Fair Work Commission found that the application process was fair and that the agreement's terms were appropriate. The Commission concluded that there was no procedural unfairness in its decision-making process and that the agreement's provisions were consistent with the relevant legislation. The Commission dismissed the application on the grounds that the procedural fairness was maintained and the agreement's terms were appropriate. The decision was made in light of the evidence presented and the Commission's understanding of the relevant legal principles.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.