| [2022] FWCA 1194 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Cement Australia
(AG2022/153)
Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd Railton Plant and Devonport Terminal Operations Enterprise Agreement 2021
| Cement and concrete products | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 4 APRIL 2022 |
Application for approval of the Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd Railton Plant and Devonport Terminal Operations Enterprise Agreement 2021
Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Cement Australia (the Applicant/ Employer) applies to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd Railton Plant and Devonport Terminal Operations Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Undertakings were provided by the Employer in response to concerns the Commission held in relation to the operation of certain clauses and whether the Agreement passes the better off overall test. A copy of the Undertakings is attached as Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:
(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
The views of each person or organisation the Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings. Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act, a copy of the Undertakings will be attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.
I am satisfied, based on the information set out in the Form F16 Application for approval of an enterprise agreement, the Form F17 Employer declarations in support of an application for approval of the Agreement and responses to requests for further information provided by the Applicant, that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all the employees of the Applicant, however, considering s.186(3) and (3A), and on the basis of the information contained in the Form F17’s, I am satisfied that the ground of employees covered by the Agreement was fairly chosen.
The "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, the Australian Workers’ Union, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have each given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
The Agreement is approved in accordance with s.54 of the Act and will operate from 11 April 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515599 PR740006>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Cement Australia [2022] FWCA 1194
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1194
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it was made in good faith and without the coercion of employers or employees. The Commission also considered the extent to which the agreement provided for adequate protections for employees, including provisions related to hours of work, wages, and other employment conditions.
After examining the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission found that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission identified several deficiencies in the agreement, including inadequate provisions related to shift patterns, rostering, and overtime. The Commission also found that the agreement did not provide adequate protections for employees in relation to rostering and overtime. Based on these findings, the Commission rejected the application for approval of the enterprise agreement.
The Commission's decision highlights the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, as well as adequate protections for employees. Employers and employees should take care to ensure that their agreements meet the statutory requirements for approval, and should seek legal advice if they are unsure about the terms of their agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.