CELONA & ALDRIN

In the matter of *Celona & Aldrin*, heard by Judge Heffernan, the dispute concerned the division of assets between former de facto partners. The relationship had lasted for approximately three years and eight months. A key element of the dispute involved a former home of the relationship which had been rezoned, leading to a significant increase in its value. The court was required to consider the financial and non-financial contributions of each party, as well as their future needs, in determining the appropriate property settlement.

The court was tasked with determining the appropriate percentage division of the parties' assets, taking into account their respective contributions and future needs. This involved assessing the impact of the rezoning of the former home on its value and how that increase should be factored into the overall settlement. The court also had to consider objections to evidence presented during the proceedings and make rulings on their admissibility.

Judge Heffernan ordered a division of assets on the basis of 70 percent to the de facto husband and 30 percent to the de facto wife. To give effect to this, the net proceeds from the sale of "The B Property" were to be divided, with a specific amount allocated to the de facto wife's solicitor and the balance to the de facto husband. Each party was to retain specific personalty, savings, investments, motor vehicles, and superannuation entitlements in their sole name. The orders also included provisions for mutual indemnification regarding liabilities and the property retained by each party. In the event of non-compliance, the Registrar of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Adelaide was appointed to execute necessary documents. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.