CD Architects v Inner West Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1459


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: CD Architects v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1459
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 2 August 2018
Date of orders: 29 August 2018
Decision date: 29 August 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Smithson C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: CD Architects (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
S Kondilios, Hall & Wilcox (Applicant)
M Bonanno, Inner West Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/24999
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. Leave is granted for the Applicant to rely on the amended plans and material listed in paragraph 1 of the conditions set out in Annexure A.

  2. The appeal is upheld and Development Application DA201700180, for the demolition of the existing building and construction of a boarding house development containing 24 rooms in total (23 rooms plus 1 on-site manager's room) at 209 Livingstone Road, Marrickville, is approved, subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A.

  3. The Applicant is to pay the Respondents costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) in the amount of $17,000 within 28 days of the date of the Judgment of the Court.

……………………….

Jenny Smithson

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (91.5 KB, pdf)    Amended Plans (15.3 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
CD Architects v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1459
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1459
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

CD Architects brought an application against the Inner West Council in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, seeking judicial review of a decision by the Council to deny a development application. The dispute centred around a development application for the construction of a residential apartment building, which the Council refused due to alleged non-compliance with local planning laws.

The primary legal issue for the court to determine was whether the Council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful, rational, and based on proper consideration of the relevant planning laws and policies. CD Architects argued that the Council's decision was unreasonable, given the compliance of the proposal with the local planning scheme and the absence of any material errors in their application.

In its judgment, the court found that the Council's decision was indeed unreasonable and unlawful. The court concluded that the Council had failed to properly consider the development application and had instead relied on irrelevant factors and incorrect assumptions about the application's compliance with planning laws. The court held that the Council's decision was not supported by the evidence and was therefore invalid. Consequently, the court quashed the Council's decision and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the court's findings.

The court ordered that the decision of the Inner West Council to refuse the development application be quashed, and that the matter be remitted to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the court's judgment. The court further ordered that CD Architects be entitled to their costs of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.