Cawley and Cawley
Case
•
[2016] FamCA 899
•26 October 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Cawley and Cawley [2016] FamCA 899
[2016] FamCA 899
26 October 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Cawley and Cawley*, Rees J made orders concerning the living arrangements and contact arrangements for two children, B and C. The dispute involved the parents' parental responsibilities and the father's contact with the children.
The court was required to determine the primary caregiver for the children, the extent of the father's parental responsibility and contact, and the role of a therapist in facilitating the children's welfare and potentially their relationship with the father. The court also considered issues relating to the children's schooling, travel, and the costs associated with the Independent Children's Lawyer and a report by Dr D.
Rees J ordered that the children live with the mother and that she have sole parental responsibility for their care, welfare, and development. The father was significantly restrained from contacting the children, with limited exceptions for birthdays and Christmas, and only upon the therapist's request. The court mandated the appointment of a therapist, who was empowered to involve both parents in therapy and make recommendations, including regarding disclosure of the father's criminal offences. The court also made orders regarding the children's passports, overseas travel, and the division of costs for the Independent Children's Lawyer and Dr D's report.
The court was required to determine the primary caregiver for the children, the extent of the father's parental responsibility and contact, and the role of a therapist in facilitating the children's welfare and potentially their relationship with the father. The court also considered issues relating to the children's schooling, travel, and the costs associated with the Independent Children's Lawyer and a report by Dr D.
Rees J ordered that the children live with the mother and that she have sole parental responsibility for their care, welfare, and development. The father was significantly restrained from contacting the children, with limited exceptions for birthdays and Christmas, and only upon the therapist's request. The court mandated the appointment of a therapist, who was empowered to involve both parents in therapy and make recommendations, including regarding disclosure of the father's criminal offences. The court also made orders regarding the children's passports, overseas travel, and the division of costs for the Independent Children's Lawyer and Dr D's report.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Injunction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Cawley and Cawley [2016] FamCA 899
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0