Cavar v Commonwealth of Australia as represented by and acting through the Department of Human Services
Case
•
[2016] NSWCA 312
•14 November 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Cavar v Commonwealth of Australia as represented by and acting through the Department of Human Services [2016] NSWCA 312
[2016] NSWCA 312
14 November 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Mr. Cavar, sought leave to appeal against a decision of the Federal Court of Australia to strike out his pleadings. The respondent was the Commonwealth of Australia, represented by the Department of Human Services. The core of the dispute concerned the applicant's attempt to file a summons which was filed out of time, leading to the striking out of his pleadings.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the applicant should be granted leave to file his summons out of time. This required the court to consider whether the matter raised an issue of principle, public importance, or whether refusing the application would result in injustice.
The Court of Appeal refused the application for leave to file the summons out of time. The court did not provide detailed reasons for this refusal in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the threshold for granting such an extension, particularly in the context of an appeal concerning pleadings struck out for being out of time, was not met.
Consequently, the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the respondent for both the application for leave to appeal out of time and the application for leave to appeal. These costs were quantified at $5,000 as a gross sum.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the applicant should be granted leave to file his summons out of time. This required the court to consider whether the matter raised an issue of principle, public importance, or whether refusing the application would result in injustice.
The Court of Appeal refused the application for leave to file the summons out of time. The court did not provide detailed reasons for this refusal in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the threshold for granting such an extension, particularly in the context of an appeal concerning pleadings struck out for being out of time, was not met.
Consequently, the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the respondent for both the application for leave to appeal out of time and the application for leave to appeal. These costs were quantified at $5,000 as a gross sum.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Limitation Periods
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Taree Truck Centre Pty Ltd v Kneeward Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 16
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
1
Cavar v Department of Human Services (Comcover Insurance and Compensation Department)
[2016] NSWCA 195
Macatangay v State of New South Wales (No 2)
[2009] NSWCA 272
McGinn v Cranbrook School
[2015] NSWCA 378