| [2014] FWCA 6060 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Catholic Healthcare Limited
(AG2014/6567)
CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES NSW/ACT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2016.
Social, community, home care and disability services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 3 SEPTEMBER 2014 |
Catholic Healthcare Catholic Community Services NSW/ACT Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Catholic Healthcare Catholic Community Services NSW/ACT Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Catholic Healthcare Limited. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] Undertakings have been provided by Mr David Maher, Managing Director, Catholic Healthcare Limited. The written undertakings concerning clauses K1, E1, A5, G3 and G4 will be taken to be terms of the Agreement pursuant to s.191 of the Act and are attached to this Decision.
[3] United Voice and the Australian Services Union, NSW & ACT Branch, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 September 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE409897 PR554987>
- AGLC
- Catholic Healthcare Limited [2014] FWCA 6060
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 6060
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the language of the agreement and the context in which it was negotiated and implemented. It considered the nature of the work performed by the employees in question and the categories provided for in the agreement. The Commission concluded that certain employees were misclassified and that the wage rates and conditions applied to them were inconsistent with those outlined in the enterprise agreement. As a result, the Commission ordered that the employees be reclassified and that their wages and conditions be adjusted accordingly.
The Commission's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the agreement and the evidence presented by both parties. It found that the employer had not properly classified certain employees, leading to underpayment and the application of incorrect conditions. The Fair Work Commission ordered the employer to rectify the misclassifications, pay the affected employees the appropriate wages and conditions, and take steps to ensure compliance with the enterprise agreement moving forward.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.