[2014] FWCA 1896 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Caterpillar Underground Mining Pty Ltd
(AG2014/3956)
CAT UGM WORKPLACE AGREEMENT 2011-2014
Tasmania | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 21 MARCH 2014 |
Application for variation of the CAT UGM Workplace Agreement 2011-2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement known as the CAT UGM Workplace Agreement 2011-2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by The Caterpillar Underground Mining Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met. I approve the variation which is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] The consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision. In accordance with s.216 of the Act the variation will operate on and from 21 March 2014.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE887786 PR548832>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Caterpillar Underground Mining Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1896
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 1896
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the proposed changes were reasonable and necessary in light of the altered circumstances, and whether the application met the statutory criteria for a variation of a workplace agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The court had to balance the interests of the employer in adapting to new operational realities with the rights and protections afforded to employees under the agreement.
The court found that the proposed changes were reasonable and necessary, considering the significant changes in the industry and the specific operational context of Caterpillar Underground Mining. The applicant demonstrated that the modifications were aimed at improving efficiency and were not intended to undermine employee rights. The court also determined that the application met the statutory criteria for a variation of a workplace agreement. Therefore, the application was approved, and the workplace agreement was varied accordingly.
The final orders included the approval of the proposed changes to the CAT UGM Workplace Agreement 2011-2014, effective from the date specified in the application. The agreement was amended to reflect the changes deemed necessary by the court, ensuring that the terms were aligned with the current operational and economic conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.