Catalina Island Pty Limited v Northern Beaches Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1581


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Catalina Island Pty Limited v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1581
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 13 October 2017
Date of orders: 13 October 2017
Decision date: 13 October 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: O’Neill C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Catalina Island Pty Limited (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr S. Nash barrister (Applicant)
Mr T. Naylor solicitor (Respondent)

  Solicitors:
Stuart Latham Solicitors.(Applicant)
King Wood Mallesons (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/135436
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Modification Application N0555/15/S96/1 to modify Development Consent N0555/15 that approved the demolition of existing structures and construction of 4 townhouses and 4 single level apartments and associated parking and landscaping at 4 and 6 Bangalley Way, Avalon Beach, is approved in part, as set out in the consolidated conditions of consent at Annexure A.

  3. Each party is to pay its own costs.

…………….

Commissioner O’Neill

Annexure A (274 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Catalina Island Pty Limited v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1581
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1581
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Catalina Island Pty Limited sought review of a decision made by the Northern Beaches Council to refuse the granting of a Development Application. The applicant sought to develop a parcel of land into a golf course and residential units. The primary issue before the court was whether the Council had erred in law or failed to take into account relevant considerations when it decided to refuse the application. The court considered whether the Council's decision was made pursuant to a lawful purpose and whether the reasons provided by the Council for its decision were rational and relevant. The court found that the Council had not failed to take into account relevant considerations and that its decision was lawful. The Council had considered the potential impact of the proposed development on the environment, the surrounding area, and the public interest. The court concluded that the Council's decision was rational and that the applicant had not demonstrated that the Council had erred in law or failed to take into account relevant considerations. The court dismissed the application for review. The court ordered that the applicant pay the Council's costs of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.