Casey and Derrick (Child support)

This matter concerned an application by Casey for a departure determination under the *Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988* (Cth) against Derrick, the liable parent. The dispute centred on whether the child support assessment should be varied due to Derrick's income, property, and financial resources. The decision was made by S De Bono SM in the [Court Name].

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether a ground for departure from the child support assessment had been established, and if so, whether it was just and equitable to depart from the assessment. This involved considering the specific circumstances of the parties and the child, particularly in relation to Derrick's financial position.

The Court found that a ground for departure was established, necessitating a consideration of whether to depart from the assessment. The reasoning applied focused on the legislative criteria for departure, weighing the financial circumstances of the liable parent against the purpose of child support. Ultimately, the Court determined that it was just and equitable to depart from the existing assessment.

The Court varied the decision under review, indicating that the child support assessment would be altered based on the findings made regarding Derrick's income, property, and financial resources.