| [2022] FWCA 4527 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd T/A Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd
(AG2022/5172)
Cascade Brewery Operations and CFMEU’s Enterprise Agreement 2022
| Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT | PERTH, 20 DECEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Cascade Brewery Operations and CFMEU’s Enterprise Agreement 2022
Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd T/A Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd (the Applicant) has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cascade Brewery Operations and CFMEU’s Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the organisation), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the organisation is covered by the Agreement.
The Agreement was approved on 20 December 2022 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 27 December 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE518679 PR749133>
- AGLC
- Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd T/A Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 4527
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 4527
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission began its analysis by assessing whether the agreement contained the necessary "key terms" as outlined in the Fair Work Act, ensuring it did not undermine the minimum protections provided by awards or registered agreements. The Commission then considered the bargaining process, evaluating if it was conducted in good faith and whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated. It was also required to determine if the agreement appropriately addressed issues such as wages, conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. After careful consideration, the Commission found that the agreement substantially met the legislative requirements and did not undermine the protections afforded to employees by existing awards. The proposed provisions were deemed fair and reasonable, balancing the interests of both parties. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.