Casano and Antipov (No 2)

In *Casano and Antipov (No 2)*, Hannam J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the father for an adjournment of proceedings. The specific nature of the underlying dispute between the parties, beyond the father's request for an adjournment, is not detailed in the provided text.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the father's application for an adjournment should be granted. This required the court to assess the grounds upon which the adjournment was sought and to determine if those grounds met the threshold for granting such a request in family law proceedings.

Hannam J dismissed the father's application for an adjournment. While the specific reasoning is not elaborated upon in the provided text, the decision indicates that the court found insufficient grounds to warrant delaying the proceedings. The court's refusal to adjourn signifies a determination that the matter should proceed as scheduled.