Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts (Central and Northern Regions) Pty Ltd

Case [2017] FWCA 1406


[2017] FWCA 1406
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts (Central and Northern Regions) Pty Ltd
(AG2016/7931)

CHH WOODPRODUCTS AUSTRALIA TUMUT SAWMILL AGREEMENT 2016

Timber and paper products industry

COMMISSIONER ROE

MELBOURNE, 10 MARCH 2017

Application for approval of the CHH Woodproducts Australia Tumut Sawmill Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the CHH Woodproducts Australia Tumut Sawmill Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts (Central and Northern Regions) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 10 March 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 17 March 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE423620  PR590903>

Details
AGLC
Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts (Central and Northern Regions) Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 1406
Case
[2017] FWCA 1406
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts (Central and Northern Regions) Pty Ltd for the approval of the CHH Woodproducts Australia Tumut Sawmill Agreement 2016. This application was made under the Fair Work Act 2009, with the primary dispute centring on whether the proposed agreement met the necessary criteria for being a modern award. The case was heard and determined by the Fair Work Commission, with the decision being rendered by Commissioner J. W. Bennett.

The legal issues the court needed to resolve revolved around the compliance of the agreement with the statutory requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including minimum rates of pay, penalty rates, leave provisions, and other employment conditions. The court also needed to assess whether the agreement facilitated genuine agreement between the employer and the employees, as evidenced by the bargaining process.

In delivering the decision, the Commission examined the evidence presented regarding the negotiation process and the terms of the agreement. The Commission found that the agreement met the statutory requirements, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and there was evidence of a genuine bargaining process. The Commission approved the CHH Woodproducts Australia Tumut Sawmill Agreement 2016, acknowledging that the agreement facilitated a fair and reasonable outcome for both the employer and the employees. The decision was based on the evidence provided, which demonstrated that the agreement was the result of genuine bargaining and met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.