Carter and Carter

Case

[2014] FCCA 1958

29 August 2014


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Carter and Carter [2014] FCCA 1958 [2014] FCCA 1958 29 August 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned orders made by Judge Scarlett in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia concerning property settlement between an Applicant Wife and a Respondent Husband. The dispute involved the division of various real properties, including Property R, Property B, and Property G, as well as personal property and financial liabilities.

The court was required to determine the specific terms of the property settlement, including the transfer of interests in real estate, the discharge and substitution of mortgages, the release of personal guarantees, the relinquishment of beneficial interests in a trust, and the payment of a sum of money. The court also had to establish a framework for the sale of properties and the distribution of proceeds in the event of non-compliance with the primary orders, and to clarify the sole entitlement of each party to various assets and liabilities.

The court ordered that within three months, the Wife was to transfer her interest in Property R to the Husband, who was to discharge the existing mortgage and substitute a new one in his name. The Husband was also to secure the Wife's release from personal guarantees, except in relation to Property C, and the Wife was to relinquish her interest in the Carter Family Trust. The Husband was ordered to pay the Wife $140,278.00. In the event of the Husband's failure to comply, the properties at Property B and Property R were to be sold by public auction, with the proceeds distributed in a specific priority, including the payment of the $140,278.00 and any interest to the Wife. If a shortfall remained, Property G was to be sold, with its proceeds applied to cover the shortfall and any interest owed to the Wife. The Husband was declared solely entitled to Property B, Property R, and Property G, as well as a specified vehicle and personal property in his possession. Each party was to indemnify the other against liabilities in their sole name. A Registrar was appointed to execute documents if a party failed to comply with the orders.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Property Law

  • Equity & Trusts

Legal Concepts

  • Remedies

  • Costs

  • Injunction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

5

Statutory Material Cited

4

CARTER & CARTER [2011] FMCAfam 750
CARTER & CARTER (No.2) [2011] FMCAfam 935
Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52