Carlow and Carlow (No 2)

In the matter of *Carlow and Carlow (No 2)*, Cronin J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application for variation of existing orders made on 21 September 2010. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties, beyond the application for variation, is not detailed in the provided text.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the existing orders of 21 September 2010 should be varied. The court was also required to consider and make orders in accordance with minutes of proposed orders presented by the parties, which were to be sealed and attached to the judgment.

Cronin J dismissed the application for variation of the existing orders. However, by consent of the parties, the court made orders in accordance with the minutes of proposed orders, which were to be engrossed by the wife's solicitor and delivered to the Associate within seven days. The court further directed that these minutes remain on the Court file, noting that paragraph 3 of the minutes constituted a formal order of the Court. Additionally, the parties were ordered to attend a conciliation conference, and a Fact Sheet detailing the obligations, consequences of contravention, and available assistance for compliance was to be attached to the orders pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation.