Carbone v Metricon Homes Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2018] NSWCA 296
•07 December 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Carbone v Metricon Homes Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 296
[2018] NSWCA 296
07 December 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal concerned a dispute between Carbone (the purchaser) and Metricon Homes Pty Ltd (the vendor) arising from deeds of put and call option for the sale of land. The purchaser paid a call option fee upon entering into the deed. A key term of the contract stipulated that if the vendor failed to register a plan of subdivision as required, the purchaser had the right to "rescind" the contract. The central issue was the interpretation of the word "rescind" in this context.
The court was required to determine whether the term "rescind" in the contract meant to treat the contract as void from its inception, thereby entitling the purchaser to a refund of the call option fee, or whether it meant to terminate only the executory obligations under the contract, leaving the call option fee forfeited.
The Court of Appeal, comprising Meagher, Payne and White JJA, dismissed the appeal. Their Honours reasoned that the ordinary meaning of "rescind" in a contractual context, particularly where a party has a right to terminate due to a breach, is to bring the contract to an end from that point forward, rather than to treat it as if it never existed. This interpretation meant that the executory obligations of the contract were terminated, but the executed parts, including the payment of the call option fee, remained.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
The court was required to determine whether the term "rescind" in the contract meant to treat the contract as void from its inception, thereby entitling the purchaser to a refund of the call option fee, or whether it meant to terminate only the executory obligations under the contract, leaving the call option fee forfeited.
The Court of Appeal, comprising Meagher, Payne and White JJA, dismissed the appeal. Their Honours reasoned that the ordinary meaning of "rescind" in a contractual context, particularly where a party has a right to terminate due to a breach, is to bring the contract to an end from that point forward, rather than to treat it as if it never existed. This interpretation meant that the executory obligations of the contract were terminated, but the executed parts, including the payment of the call option fee, remained.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Contract Law
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Breach
-
Contract Formation
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
26
Statutory Material Cited
1
Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon
[1993] HCA 4
Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon
[1993] HCA 4
Metricon Homes Pty Ltd v Carbone
[2017] NSWDC 256