Carbon Revolution Operations Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 2659


[2025] FWCA 2659

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Carbon Revolution Operations Pty Ltd

(AG2025/1842)

CARBON REVOLUTION OPERATIONS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025-2026

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER MIRABELLA

MELBOURNE, 8 AUGUST 2025

Application for approval of the Carbon Revolution Operations Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025-2026

  1. An application has been made for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Carbon Revolution Operations Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025-2026. The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). It has been made by Carbon Revolution Operations Pty Ltd (the Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The F17 Declaration submitted by the Employer did not include information about whether employees have a sufficient interest in the terms of the agreement or were sufficiently representative of the employees it intends to cover. Consequently, the Commission was unable to make a determination on these matters. The Employer subsequently provided submissions which included information relevant to the issue of sufficient interest and sufficiently representative. Based on those submissions I am satisfied that the employees requested to approve the agreement by voting for it have a sufficient interest in the terms of the agreement and are sufficiently representative.

  1. The NERR indicated that the Agreement will cover employees currently covered under the ‘Carbon Revolution Operations Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2023-2025’. We note that the previous Agreement classifications are listed from B-G, whereas the proposed Agreement lists the classifications as A-G. However, as there were previously two E level classifications, the total number of classifications in both Agreements remains the same. Additionally, the coverage outlined in clause 2.2 of both Agreements has not changed. The Employer provided submissions that this matter constituted a minor technical error. I am satisfied having regard to those submissions and the decision of the Full Bench in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others,[1] that these matters constituted minor technical or procedural errors for the purposes of s.188(5) of the Act, and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the errors.

  1. I observe the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  • Clause 5.6
  • Clause 6.1

The Employer provided a NES precedence clause within their undertakings. I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Employer provided written undertakings to address certain BOOT issues. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure 4 of the Agreement. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the AMWU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 15 August 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 8 August 2026.

COMMISSIONER


[1] [2019] FWCFB 318.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE530010  PR790534>

Details
AGLC
Carbon Revolution Operations Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 2659
Case
[2025] FWCA 2659
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Carbon Revolution Operations Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of their enterprise agreement for the period 2025-2026. The applicant is a company involved in the manufacturing of carbon fibre wheels for racing cars, and the agreement concerned the terms and conditions of employment for their employees. The dispute arose as the Fair Work Commission needed to determine whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and other relevant legislative provisions.

The primary legal issues the Fair Work Commission had to decide were whether the proposed terms and conditions in the agreement were fair and reasonable, met the minimum standards prescribed by the Fair Work Act, and adhered to the applicable awards and other relevant instruments. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement had been made in good faith and whether the parties had bargaining in a manner consistent with the legislative framework.

The Fair Work Commission examined the proposed terms and conditions of the agreement and found that they were fair and reasonable, met the minimum standards, and were consistent with the applicable awards and instruments. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement had been made in good faith and that the parties had bargained in accordance with the legislative framework. The Commission took into account the parties' submissions, the evidence provided, and the relevant legal principles in reaching its decision.

Based on its findings, the Fair Work Commission approved the Carbon Revolution Operations Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025-2026. The agreement will now govern the terms and conditions of employment for the employees of Carbon Revolution Operations Pty Ltd for the specified period.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.