Carberry v Drice as Rep of Brisbane Junior Rugby Union (An unincorporated Body)
Case
•
[2011] QSC 16
•11/01/2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Carberry v Drice as Rep of Brisbane Junior Rugby Union (An unincorporated Body) [2011] QSC 16
[2011] QSC 16
11/01/2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Carberry sought declarations, injunctions, and damages against the first to fifth respondents, who were involved in the regulation and control of rugby in Brisbane and Queensland. Carberry, who held multiple positions in rugby, was suspended and excluded from rugby grounds after punching a volunteer first aid officer at a junior rugby game. Carberry argued that the Court should interfere in the internal management of the respondents, as his livelihood and reputation were at stake. Additionally, Carberry sought damages, despite not being a member of or having a contractual relationship with the respondents.
The court had to determine whether it should interfere in the internal management of the first to third respondents, voluntary associations. It also had to consider whether Carberry's livelihood or reputation was at risk, and if he had a real interest to establish. Furthermore, the court examined whether Carberry could recover damages from the respondents, despite not being a member or in a contractual relationship with them. Lastly, the court assessed whether Carberry's claims against the first, second, and third respondents for declaratory and injunctive relief, and his claim against the fifth respondent for declaratory relief, vested in his trustee in bankruptcy and were divisible among creditors.
The court dismissed Carberry's claim against the fourth respondent and ordered Carberry to pay the fourth respondent's costs of and incidental to the proceeding. It further ordered Carberry and the first, second, third, and fifth respondents to make written submissions regarding the form of the orders and costs by 4pm on 31 January 2011. The proceeding concerning those parties was adjourned to a date to be fixed.
The court had to determine whether it should interfere in the internal management of the first to third respondents, voluntary associations. It also had to consider whether Carberry's livelihood or reputation was at risk, and if he had a real interest to establish. Furthermore, the court examined whether Carberry could recover damages from the respondents, despite not being a member or in a contractual relationship with them. Lastly, the court assessed whether Carberry's claims against the first, second, and third respondents for declaratory and injunctive relief, and his claim against the fifth respondent for declaratory relief, vested in his trustee in bankruptcy and were divisible among creditors.
The court dismissed Carberry's claim against the fourth respondent and ordered Carberry to pay the fourth respondent's costs of and incidental to the proceeding. It further ordered Carberry and the first, second, third, and fifth respondents to make written submissions regarding the form of the orders and costs by 4pm on 31 January 2011. The proceeding concerning those parties was adjourned to a date to be fixed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
-
Contract Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Breach of Contract
-
Declaratory Relief
-
Injunction
-
Limitation Periods
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Carberry v Drice as Rep of Brisbane Junior Rugby Union (An unincorporated Body) [2011] QSC 16
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
20
Statutory Material Cited
3
Kovacic v Australian Karting Association (Qld) Inc
[2008] QSC 344
Kovacic v Australian Karting Association (Qld) Inc
[2008] QSC 344
Australian Wool Innovation Ltd v Newkirk
[2005] FCA 290