Carberry v Australian Capital Territory
Case
•
[2022] ACTCA 55
•19 October 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Carberry v Australian Capital Territory [2022] ACTCA 55
[2022] ACTCA 55
19 October 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Carberry, sought leave to appeal an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory. The respondent was the Australian Capital Territory. The precise nature of the dispute leading to the interlocutory judgment is not detailed in the provided text.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether to grant leave to appeal against the interlocutory judgment. This required the court to consider the merits of the proposed appeal and whether it raised a question of law or a matter of public importance, or if there was a strong probability that the judgment below was wrong.
Elkaim J dismissed the application for leave to appeal. The reasons for this dismissal are not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the threshold for granting leave was not met.
Consequently, the application in proceeding filed on 21 September 2022 was dismissed, with each party ordered to bear their own costs of the application.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether to grant leave to appeal against the interlocutory judgment. This required the court to consider the merits of the proposed appeal and whether it raised a question of law or a matter of public importance, or if there was a strong probability that the judgment below was wrong.
Elkaim J dismissed the application for leave to appeal. The reasons for this dismissal are not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the threshold for granting leave was not met.
Consequently, the application in proceeding filed on 21 September 2022 was dismissed, with each party ordered to bear their own costs of the application.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Featherstone v Australian Capital Territory
[2022] ACTSC 250