Capital Securities No 1 Pty Ltd v Saliba (No 2); Saliba v Mitry

The case involved Capital Securities No 1 Pty Ltd and Saliba, as well as Saliba and Mitry, and was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The primary dispute centred around the enforcement of an injunction, specifically the quantum of proceeds from the sale of a property that should be restrained. The court was tasked with determining whether the injunction issued by the duty judge was appropriate in its quantum and whether the parties' submissions on the matter raised any questions of principle.

The legal issues before the court were whether the injunction issued by the duty judge was correct in its quantum and whether the submissions made by the parties on this matter raised any questions of principle. The court needed to assess the appropriate amount of proceeds to be restrained and whether the duty judge's order was justified.

The court found that the submissions made by the parties did not raise any questions of principle. It determined that the duty judge's order was correct in its quantum and that there was no need for further intervention on the matter. The court was satisfied with the reasoning provided by the duty judge and upheld the injunction as it stood.

No additional orders were made by the court. The decision confirmed the injunction as issued by the duty judge, with no changes to the quantum of proceeds to be restrained.