DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

Capital Health Network Ltd
(AG2016/1383)

COMMISSIONER JOHNS

SYDNEY, 29 JUNE 2016

Application for termination of the ACT Medicare Local Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016.

[1] On 31 May 2016, Capital Health Network Ltd made an application in the Fair Work Commission (Commission) to terminate the ACT Medicare Local Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (Agreement) under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)(Act).
[2] Any employee or organisation opposing the termination of the Agreement was directed to file submissions in opposition by 24 June 2016 (Directions).
[3] The applicant was directed to email a copy of the Directions to its employees and file a statutory declaration confirming compliance with the same.
[4] On 21 June 2016, Ms Gaylene Coulton, Chief Executive, filed a statutory declaration, confirming that the Directions had been emailed to employees.
[5] No submissions in opposition were received.
[6] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[7] The termination will come into effect from 29 June 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case were Capital Health Network Ltd (CHN), an entity that operates under the Commonwealth's Department of Health, and the Health Services Union of Australia (HSU), which represented the interests of certain employees. The dispute pertained to an application by CHN seeking the termination of the ACT Medicare Local Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016. This matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, which is responsible for resolving workplace disputes in Australia.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether CHN could lawfully apply for the termination of the enterprise agreement and, if so, whether the conditions for such a termination were satisfied. The HSU argued that CHN had not met the stringent criteria necessary to justify the termination of the agreement, which is generally only permissible if there have been substantial changes in circumstances since the agreement's inception. CHN contended that significant economic and operational changes within the organisation warranted a review of the agreement to ensure its continued fairness and relevance.

In delivering its decision, the Commission examined the evidence provided by both parties regarding the alleged substantial changes in circumstances. It considered factors such as financial performance, changes in the workforce, and shifts in operational practices. The Commission determined that CHN had not demonstrated the required substantial change in circumstances that would justify terminating the enterprise agreement. The Commission also noted that the agreement itself contained mechanisms for addressing potential changes through negotiation, which had not been exhausted by CHN. Consequently, the application for termination was dismissed.

The Fair Work Commission's decision concluded that the application for termination of the ACT Medicare Local Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 was not substantiated. The Commission upheld the agreement, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the negotiation process outlined within the agreement to address any concerns regarding its terms. This ruling underscored the principle that enterprise agreements should not be terminated lightly and that there must be a clear and substantial change in circumstances to justify such a significant step.

Capital Health Network Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established