Cantanor and Beidenhope (No. 2)

In *Cantanor and Beidenhope (No. 2)*, Murphy J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application to discharge an order made by Forrest J on 6 January 2012. The proceedings originated from an Initiating Application filed by the wife on 7 January 2010.

The central legal issue before Murphy J was whether paragraph 3 of the previous orders of Forrest J should be discharged. This involved determining the appropriate course of action for the ongoing family law proceedings initiated by the wife.

Murphy J reasoned that the existing order of Forrest J was no longer appropriate and should be set aside. The court's decision to discharge the order indicates a shift in the procedural management of the case.

Consequently, Murphy J ordered that paragraph 3 of the Orders of Forrest J made on 6 January 2012 be discharged. The proceedings commenced by the wife's Initiating Application were then directed to be listed for mention before the docket registrar.